Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 01:46

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thin, Light and Built to Last: The New Era of the Galaxy Z Series - Samsung Newsroom
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
US researchers solve tokamak plasma mystery with elusive ‘voids’ discovery - Interesting Engineering
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Thank you.
Mario Kart World is the perfect Switch 2 launch game - The Verge
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Putin's uncompromising demands emerge after the latest round of Russia-Ukraine peace talks - AP News
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Roman Anthony changes to jersey number with a lot of Red Sox history - MassLive
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
China fast tracks rare earth export licences for European companies - Financial Times
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.